Wednesday, December 10, 2003
Bydaway, the dumbest argument I've heard on the subject of college football and the BCS is that the old way was best because the annual arguing over who was the best football team made it unique and was a good thing. Now there's nothing wrong with the argument that there doesn't need to be a champion or there's nothing wrong with having two or more legitimate champions. Those points of view, I think, have merit. But saying that because a system causes arguments makes it a good system is just dumb. What next, thinking that both mlb leagues should keep their DH rules just so people can keep arguing over whether the DH is a good idea?
Comments:
Post a Comment
